OFMStars · checked 2026-09-08
OFMStars agency comparisons
We compare agencies using eight facts a creator can verify before signing: whether a legal entity is published, whether real people are named, whether commission is stated in writing, whether contract and exit terms are available, whether Russian or Ukrainian support is genuine, whether independent creator reviews exist, whether the operating history can be traced, and whether the agency's own numbers agree.
Each criterion scores zero, one or two points. Commission breaks a tie first, then independent reviews, then alphabetical order. The maximum is 16. We checked public websites, structured data, legal pages, sitemaps and independent profiles on 2026-09-08. We did not test private contracts, actual creator payouts, local search positions or private channels.
This method measures verifiability, not service quality. A low score does not prove poor work, and a high score does not guarantee good work. It shows how much of an agency's promise can be checked before you commit. OFMStars is an interested party and scores itself zero where team names are not published. Read about OFMStars and rerun every check yourself.
Comparisons
- OFMStars vs AROA Agency
- OFMStars vs Bunny Agency
- OFMStars vs SheX Agency
- OFMStars vs Teasy Agency
- OFMStars vs TopStar MGMT
- OFMStars vs Unfiltered Management
Percentage or turnover: what actually determines income
A percentage alone does not show income: the turnover it applies to matters. We fund traffic, 24/7 chat coverage, funnel analytics, positioning and the content plan; with your own traffic, the creator share rises to 40%.
↔ Scroll the table to see creator income
| Platform payout (after its 20%) | Creator's share | Creator keeps |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | 30% | $900 |
| $10,000 | 20% (turnkey) | $2,000 |
| $10,000 | 40% (own traffic) | $4,000 |